Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clifford Fewel's avatar

That Haines number goes to a recording that gives you three options, none of which yield a live person or even a way to leave a message. Each goes to a website referral. As for Fruit of the Loom, they have a live person who will answer your call and take a message respectfully. It appears they’ve been told to say that Fruit of the Loom management is aware of the situation in El Salvador, to which I replied awareness is not enough. Fruit of the Loom must speak out, and by doing so will gain many customers, versus losing them by remaining silent.

Expand full comment
Kate's avatar

As you requested yesterday, I wrote to my Senator, Mark Kelly, encouraging him to vote No on the Save Act. I received this very disappointing response (quoting only the salient part):

"The Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, S. 128, was introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) on January 16, 2025. The SAVE Act would amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship, such as birth certificates or passports, in order to register to vote. The bill would also require states to establish alternative processes under which citizens who cannot provide documentary proof at the time of registration, including submitting other documentation and signing an attestation under penalty of perjury that they are a U.S. citizen and eligible to vote in federal elections. This bill would duplicate the voter registration process that already exists, but would add administrative requirements and criminal penalties for election officials, increasing the likelihood that eligible voters will be prevented from voting by making it more difficult to register to vote. On April 10, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the SAVE Act's companion bill, H.R. 22, by a vote of 220 to 208. It may now be considered by the U.S. Senate.

"Every election should be secure and accessible, and states have a responsibility to ensure all eligible voters can cast a ballot without unnecessary barriers. As Arizona's senator, I remain committed to working with my colleagues in the United States Senate, both Republicans and Democrats, to ensure all Americans can trust the integrity of our elections and can fulfill their sacred right to vote."

In other words, no commitment to vote NO. I generally love and support Kelly, but he is wrong on this one. What a shame! Let's hope he comes around.

Expand full comment
52 more comments...

No posts