Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eric Lin Doub's avatar

Wow, that Rachel Bitecofer Pivot-and-Attack method is...harsh! I am so glad I have no one in my family or friends or associates to use it on. But I can see its utility. Maybe follow up with, "I'm just so pleased that since 1989 48 million of the 50 million jobs created have been under Democratic administrations. That's 96%, which I feel good about."

In the meantime, thanks for the OPM and Schedule F action, Jess! My comment was based on yours:

As a Stanford student I lived in Germany in the 1980s and learned the history of that country, including how authoritarianism took hold in the 1930s. In the USA I see a similar danger now, with Schedule F being Trump's method of enforcing loyalty to him as a Unitary Executive. This politicization of our civil service system is harmful to democracy.

Thankfully the rule you're proposing -- protecting nonpartisan civil servants -- is good. Anyone who disagrees with this wants authoritarianism, not democracy. We already know Donald Trump is planning on using political appointees, lawyers in government, and career civil servants to attain his authoritarian ends. This rule is the way to prevent it. Please, for the sake of our freedoms, enact it. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

Great list of actions today. I just submitted a comment on the OPM rule, gave to MVP and signed the Resistbot letter. All while eating lunch!

And yes we are all scared but our movement also has hope and humor, and we care for each other. They have only fear which is motivating short term but not sustainable long term. They are humorless and at each other’s throats. I would much rather be us than them.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts